Adidem Triage
Disputes, sorted
Analyze disputes, uncover trends, and let smart buckets prioritize what matters most. Strategy just got simpler.
Trust, and verify.Analytics that operate on ground truth
Metadata extracted from cases is tracable and only verified metadata is used to power the analytics.
Back decisions with data
Ideate, brainstorm, and draft with confidence.
Extract verified metadata from cases
Get instant factual answers to any query with a search that understands every nuance of the dispute
Predefined rules to automate workflows
Automatically generate and visualize case timelines
Focus on the right cases with Triaging
Extract and summarize critical points and arguments
Get historical insights with Analytics
Extract and summarize critical points and arguments
High Priority Cases
Crudops vs Rexcorp
Hexrow Industries vs Sigmadata
Hyperbeam vs DysonQube
Tokamak Inc vs Spectronix
Northrop vs Lockjaw LLC
Novamac vs Quantillion Tech
Intellectual Property Infringement
Claimant's Side
The claimant alleges that the respondent has used their patented technology without permission or licensing.
Respondent's Side
The respondent argues that their technology was independently developed and does not infringe on the claimant's patent.
Explanation
This dispute centers on the validity of the patent claim and the similarity between the two technologies. Expert testimony and detailed technical analysis will be crucial in resolving this issue.
Contract Breach Dispute
Claimant's Side
The claimant argues that the respondent breached the contract by failing to deliver the agreed-upon services within the specified timeframe.
Respondent's Side
The respondent contends that unforeseen circumstances led to delays, and that they communicated these issues to the claimant in a timely manner.
Explanation
The key issue revolves around the timely delivery of services and the communication of delays. Both parties will need to provide evidence to support their claims, including contract terms, communication records, and documentation of any unforeseen circumstances.
Employment Discrimination Case
Claimant's Side
The claimant alleges they were passed over for promotion due to their age, violating anti-discrimination laws.
Respondent's Side
The respondent maintains that the promotion decision was based solely on merit and performance criteria.
Explanation
This case will examine the company's promotion practices, the qualifications of the promoted individual versus the claimant, and any evidence of age-based bias in the workplace.
Environmental Compliance Dispute
Claimant's Side
The claimant, an environmental agency, asserts that the respondent company has exceeded permitted pollution levels.
Respondent's Side
The respondent argues that they have adhered to all regulations and that the testing methods used by the agency are flawed.
Explanation
Resolution of this dispute will require a thorough review of environmental regulations, the company's compliance records, and an assessment of the validity of the testing methods employed.
Get the big picture.
Knows the ins and outs of your every case
Always up to date analytics. Simply select a piece of text and ask for a citation to fact check or navigate deeper into the document.
Rich, shareable dashboard brings your stakeholders on the same page. Simply select a piece of text and ask for a citation to fact check or navigate deeper into the document.